“Customers are selfish and cruel” – this is what I personally believe
in. I do not blame them. They have the rights to be selfish. It is
their hard-earned money that keeps the companies alive. Every company
serves a certain group people and/or market. Markets are ever changing.
What is considered as a value added service today, maybe considered as
the obvious part of the product tomorrow. So, I was just wondering, who
defines the market for the companies. Who instigates all these changes?
Who pushes the companies become more innovative? Is it the company
itself, its customers or the competitors?
I was having a discussion with one of my colleagues lately. He is
senior to me in terms of age and industry experiences. According to him,
it should be “you”. How can he be wrong? It is the company/brand that
takes all the risks. Any industry that you want to pick, the competition
is severe. The power is no longer with the companies; it is with the
customers. They have more options, more access to information and more
purchasing power. Therefore, it is a tremendous and continuous pressure
for the companies to find out the ways to satisfy their demands, figure
out the business feasibility and finally introducing a solution/product.
But it was never easy. Companies need to adjust their capabilities with
the things customers ask for. And in some cases, companies need to look
for the things that haven’t mentioned about (in marketing term, we call
it latent demand). There is a saying “Do not listen to your customers.
Because, they do not know what they really want.” One of the greatest
CEOs of the world Steve Jobs used to believe in the same philosophy.
This philosophy never says that you ignore your customers’, rather it
puts the companies into a more responsible position. It is the
responsibility of the companies to offer new and upgraded solutions. No
customer asked for portable digital music player. But it was Apple who
introduced the player through iPod series. Please note this carefully,
the need for portable music player was already there. Apple simply
upgraded the music system into portable digital format and thus created
the demand. Periodic brand and product audits, monitor the efficiency of
supply/distribution chains, review pricing strategies, design
communication strategies, etc are some of the tools that help realize
the demands better. There are three ‘L’s to be innovative and creative
in the market. And these are Look, Learn and Leverage. Look refers to
research & development, learn refers to the insights and leverage
refers to actions that need in place to implement better. It’s a cycle
of process that should never end.
However, it is not always possible for the companies to know
everything. Companies are not gods. Lab tests might not always give
these companies the precise user experiences. Besides, companies and
customers try a new product with two different sets of motives (ignoring
other related costs). Therefore, the results cannot be the same. The
point I am trying to establish here is that, the customers also play a
major role in reshaping the business models as well as the markets. For
example, if the customers love to have more pickles with their meals,
there is no other way than to provide more pickles; as simple as that.
You cannot replace the need of “extra pickle” by offering more sauce or
anything else. Many companies are spending huge amount for extensive
market research, focused group studies, one-to-one discussions, etc just
to the get the key insight. Yes, it is possible to change the tastes of
the customers. But you cannot do it overnight and more importantly it
will involve more costs, efforts and risks. Do not get me wrong; I am
not against it. Many marketers successfully did it in the past and I do
appreciate that. But what I mean here is that it is not always the right
thing to do. Coca-cola is one of the top brands of the world. I hope
many of you can recall the epic failure of Vanilla Coke. Not just
coca-cola, there are dozens of business cases where some giant companies
failed to change the tastes.
And how can I not mention about the competitors. Many of us might not
consider competitors as the driving force. But I do. Let me give you an
example. Have you seen the demo of the new iOS 7? Check again. Apple
admitted that iOS 7 is not like the previous iOS. It is the whole new
iOS in terms of presentation and performance. Why? Apple is gradually
losing its market share to a Korean giant ‘Samsung’. Anything that
Samsung offers is appreciated by the customers. So, finally Apple had to
consider changing the look and feel of its iOS. Nokia on the other hand
introduced Asha series to tackle the Chinese brands. Consider any FMCG,
Telecom or Financial brand. You will feel the similar heat. Companies
are challenged every day for almost everything by its competitors no
matter which industry they are in.
Bottom-line: Marketing is not a pure science; it is rather a
social science. Hence, there is no universal or straightforward
solution to the problems. Problems are situation, geography, target
audience, industry, etc dependent. As a matter of fact, every problem is
unique to some extent. We cannot say exactly why a specific market did
not respond to a specific product. In the same way, it is not just the
company or the customer or the competitor changing the market; it is
rather the combination of all three. Every successful product is insight
driven/derived. And the insights mostly come from these three groups.
The intensity may differ from case to case, but the direct and/or
indirect influences cannot be overlooked.
Comments
Post a Comment